Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Key Takeaways
II. Introduction
III. Board of Regents (1981-1984) and its Consequences
A. Football Sues for its Financial Freedom
B. The Supreme Court’s “Magic Dicta”
C. The NCAA’s Hoopapalooza and Power 5 Football’s Free Ride
IV. The Legal Firewall the NCAA and Power 5 Have Built Through Federal Litigation
A. Class-action Antitrust Cases Challenging Amateurism-based Compensation
Limits
B. Other Cases Challenging NCAA Eligibility Rules or Employee Status
C. Cases in Which Courts Have Found the NCAA Has No Legal Duty to Athletes
D. NCAA v Tarkanian (1988)
V. Factors Influencing the Federal Judiciary’s Deference to Amateurism
A. Well-Intentioned (Mostly) Paternalism
B. Respect for Venerable American Institutions
C. Deference to Judgments and Choices of Voluntary Associations
D. Fear of Unintended Consequences
E. Utilitarianism
VI. Conclusion
VII. Glossary